Search for: "Don J Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 888
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
“We suspect foul play, but outside of that we don’t know,” Smith said. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Donald J. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[Their amicus brief endorses the view that members of state legislatures are officers. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
” He added, “If this isn’t impeachable, I don’t know what is. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Robert, Gregory J. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
J. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 10:23 am
Guastavino - Julio J. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:26 am
Don’t overuse keywords, as Google (and searchers) will notice. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:41 pm
We don’t have the detail here, but it seems that S.J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
Donald J. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
Its author is Judge Karin J. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Jackson (2021) (Sotomayor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (joined by Justices Kagan and Breyer) A couple of weeks ago I posted an article (here) criticizing the Court's decision in the website designer's case (303 Creative v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
