Search for: "Donald B. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 6:06 am
In an April 2 Wall Street Journal op-ed entitled “Trump Was Good for America’s Alliances,” for example, former Trump White House official Alexander B. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:01 am
Donald, Sarah E. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Kavanaugh raises President Lyndon B. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
Keith Davidson—Davidson, Clifford’s lawyer, is “Lawyer B” in the statement of facts. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am
Juror Demographics b. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Donald [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:05 am
Under subsection (b) of the provision, the President may waive this restriction if s/he determines doing so would be in the national interest. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:05 am
Under subsection (b) of the provision, the President may waive this restriction if s/he determines doing so would be in the national interest. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
(On Nov. 18, 2022, Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:29 am
Smith, Roger. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Capitol last month, former President Donald Trump claimed that his supporters had acted “peacefully and patriotically. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Circuit, he can seek en banc review of the full court, and then, should that fail, review in the Supreme Court, which recently declined to avoid these delays when it rejected Special Counsel Jack Smith’s petition to bypass the appeals court. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
” FRAP 41(b). [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 5:47 am
As the year draws to a close, I wanted to add a few final thoughts to the holiday and new year's wishes provided by my co-bloggers last week.(1) As readers may have seen, on Friday of last week, my Verdict column implored the Supreme Court to grant Jack Smith's petition for cert before judgment to reject Donald Trump's claimed immunity to prosecution and to summarily affirm the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling that Trump is ineligible for the Presidency under… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
And on Jan. 10, in Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
§ 201(b)(2) and thus an impeachable offense under the constitutional standard of “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
Sign up to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am
§§ 16-4-8 and 16-10-20.1(b)(1), as well as the lead charge in the indictment that remains against 15 co-defendants, RICO Conspiracy, O.C.G.A. [read post]
