Search for: "Donald Barrett" Results 41 - 60 of 510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
Anderson strongly suggests a Trump victory on the grounds advanced heroically by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Three spouses of justices enter the guest box: Ashley Kavanaugh, Jesse Barrett, and Patrick Jackson. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
The specific question in this case is whether it would be lawful for Colorado to remove Donald Trump’s name from its Republican presidential primary ballot. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Ilya Somin
Anderson, the case addressing whether Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm by Mark Graber
  By invoking Section Three against Donald Trump, Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett would silence forever claims that they are tools of the president who appointed them. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
House of Representatives (by a vote of 232-197) and the Senate (57-43) determined that Donald Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021; that such conduct amounted to “high crimes and misdemeanors”; that Trump’s conduct disqualified him from holding any office under the United States by virtue of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (which the Article of Impeachment expressly cited); and that Trump accordingly “warrants … disqualification to hold… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judges Skeptical That Trump Is Immune from Jan. 6 Prosecution MSN – Rachel Weiner, Spencer Hsu, Perry Stein, and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 1/9/2024 A panel of three federal appellate judges expressed skepticism about Donald Trump’s claim to sweeping immunity from criminal prosecution and concerns about its implications, suggesting it would allow a future president to have a political rival assassinated by the military without repercussions.… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am by Will Baude
  Before Donald Trump was subject to disqualification, originalists thought that the Republicans who voted for the Fourteenth Amendment were the authoritative source on the original meaning of that text. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Likewise, when Democrats first sought to impeach President Donald Trump, they held only one hearing in the House Judiciary Committee and discarded the development of the type of evidentiary record used in past impeachments. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm by Mark Graber
  Before Donald Trump was subject to disqualification, originalists thought that the Republicans who voted for the Fourteenth Amendment were the authoritative source on the original meaning of that text. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
This particular repository is part of a much larger collection – the Trump Trials Clearinghouse – which contains similar documents and information related to other criminal and civil trials involving former President Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As most of the country gathers with family and friends to celebrate the holidays, the Supreme Court faces momentous decisions in two cases involving former President Donald Trump. [read post]