Search for: "Donald Janes"
Results 61 - 80
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2017, 9:34 am
(and continued)One problem with her analysis: Millions of those white people who voted for Donald Trump also proudly voted for Barack Obama. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
Donald J. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:57 am
In an essay from 2020, he wrote that “I like Donald Trump a lot and am extremely proud he is the American President. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
Donald Trump’s Strange and Dangerous ‘Absolute Rights’ Idea By Jane Chong, Attorney and former Law Clerk, U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Jane Chong highlighted some less-covered themes from Trump’s first press conference of his presidency. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Yesterday saw the inauguration of Donald J. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:00 am
Alpert, “National Enquirer Shieldd Donald Trump From Playboy Model’s Affair Allegation,” WSJ, 11/4/2016 Reed Albergotti, Vanessa O’Connell, and Russel Adams, “How Tiger Woods Protected His Image,” WSJ, 12/18/2009 Anna Louise Bardach, “The Hush-Hush Deal that Made Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor,” LA Magazine, 9/1/2004 NEW YORKER STORIES Ronan Farrow, “The Black Cube Chronicles,” The New Yorker, Parts I, II, and III, 10/9/2019… [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:30 am
Resources Melvin Goodwin on C-Span FBI whistleblower Jane Turner FBI whistleblower Frederic Whitehurst NWC: Whistleblower legal assistance [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:50 pm
The Justice Department Has Had to Twist Itself in Knots to Defend Trump on Emoluments By Jane Chong, Lawyer, Williams & Connolly Jane Chong says that, in defending Donald Trump, the Department of Justice has defied its tradition of interpreting the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause—which restricts government officials from accepting gifts from foreign states—in a way that looks at the simple possibility of if accepting the gift could… [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Jane Chong writes that the upcoming trial in the Senate of Donald Trump will test James Madison’s underlying theory of government—that the self-interest and ambition of each branch of government will ensure that none becomes too powerful. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 5:31 am
All I can think of is Patty Hearst and General Field Marshal Cinque.With a little research: John and Yoko, Barbara Streisand and Elliot Gould, Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland, Carly Simon and James Taylor, Steve McQueen and Ali MacGraw, Jack Nicholson and Anjelica Huston, Liz Taylor and Richard Burton, Farrah Fawcett and Lee Majors, Jerry Hall and Mick Jagger, Diane Keaton and Warren Beatty.That actually does seem much grander than what we have today, at least from the perspective… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:21 am
February 9 – Donald Marron, Urban Institute. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm
It’s not surprising that anti-choice activists feel emboldened by Donald Trump’s presidency to attack women’s health and rights — no matter if the bills they are pushing don’t stand a chance in court. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
He was actively pulling strings to destroy Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump,' an assessment the U.S. intelligence community also came to accept. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:52 am
Kelly's attorney wants to see communications between Michael Avenatti and prosecutor Kim FoxxSome on Mueller’s Team See Their Findings as More Damaging for Trump Than Barr RevealedJody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott say they were defending the ‘independence’ of the judicial systemAnalysis: The fight for Donald Trump's tax returns is officially onHouse panel authorizes subpoena for Mueller report Justice department memo says Ottawa has wiggle room to… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Donald J. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:06 pm
Senate Republicans Are Playing a Dangerous Game with the Court’s Legitimacy By Jane Chong, Lawyer, Williams & Connolly Jane Chong writes that Senate Republicans are twisting the idea of precedent to defend their attempt to place a new Justice on the Supreme Court—and that it could harm the Court’s legitimacy. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
Trump’s Words Are Not Meaningless Ramblings By Jane Chong, Lawyer, Williams & Connolly Jane Chong contends that Donald Trump’s words cannot be dismissed as ramblings without legal or policy significance—as President, he helps say what the law is, even if the courts ultimately get the last word. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Jane Chong argues that, while Donald Trump cannot mandate states lift stay-at-home orders and reopen, there is plenty he can do to indirectly make that happen—such as shaping public perception. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Impeachment Will Never Be the Same Again By Jane Chong, Lawyer, Williams & Connolly Jane Chong discusses how the impeachment of Donald Trump may set a unique precedent for future impeachments that could lead to the House undertaking all investigatory matters, with the Senate sitting only as an appellate body and declining to investigate further if it is controlled by the same party as the president. [read post]
