Search for: "Donald R. Burns" Results 41 - 60 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 3:42 am
In "Joe Biden Accepts Democratic Nomination: ‘I Will Draw on the Best of Us’/Mr. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 10:55 am
Don’t think for a moment that if you are participating in this activity, you are not being a prop for the re-election campaign of Donald Trump — because you absolutely are. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:49 pm by Stewart Baker
Once we're in this vein, we mine it, covering Silicon Valley's concerted campaign to make sure Donald Trump can't possibly repeat 2016 in 2020. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:51 pm
You have to make the inference yourself.But I want to see Biden confronted with the question: Your spokesman said that for Donald Trump to try to politicize flag burning is just that — politics. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
CNN reports (and you can hear the remarks at 43:15 of this audio): President Donald Trump said Monday that he'd support laws criminalizing flag burning, saying in a call with governors that it's time for the Supreme Court to take up the issue again as nationwide protests have intensified over the death of George Floyd…. [read post]
31 May 2020, 2:24 pm
Whatever they are, they’re — they’re militants who are coming in and burning our cities, and we’re going to get to the bottom of it. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Legislation alone cannot change those dates.Most interestingly, however, Burns notes that “the procedures for voting are generally controlled at the state level. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:08 am by Simon Lester
We will get going with our friends in America and I share the optimism of Donald Trump and I say to all the naïve and juvenile anti-Americans in this country if there are any – there seem to be some - I say grow up – and get a grip. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
On January 25, President Donald J. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Burns, the Supreme Court held that treating government jobs as patronage typically violates the First Amendment right of expressive association. [read post]