Search for: "Donald S. Anderson"
Results 61 - 80
of 529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Anderson as a basis for leaving the case to the political process. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
More than 70 “friend-of-the-court” briefs have been filed in the crucial constitutional battle over Donald Trump’s eligibility for the presidency, and some by the nation’s most respected historians and legal scholars offer compelling arguments on both sides. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 11:32 am
Anderson, a case about the 14th Amendment and Donald Trump’s eligibility to appear on the ballot in Colorado’s presidential primary. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:29 am
“The 91-year-old Republican suing to kick Donald Trump off the ballot; Norma Anderson, a trailblazing former GOP legislator, is among the Colorado voters who have challenged the Republican front-runner’s candidacy in a case that will be heard by the Supreme Court”: Patrick Marley of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
The case, Donald J. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
Anderson asserts (pp. 38-40) that Section Three can only be enforced following a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
Anderson, and many of the amici, (mis)characterize Colorado as having acted to "enforce" Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, that is not, in fact, what Colorado is doing (or would be doing, anyway, if it removed Donald Trump's name from the primary election ballot, which it hasn't done and likely won't ever do).In the course of that post, I wrote that a state lacks any power to actually enforce Section 3, or any other federal qualification for… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1] [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
The common message is that we should not apply Section Three's original meaning, if doing so would disqualify Donald Trump from eligibility for the Presidency, because it would be "dangerous" to do so. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
(Anderson-Burdick anyone?) [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am
The Anderson plaintiffs have misquoted Chiafalo. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
I also flag below one important question the parties have failed even to address, about what Colorado law authorizes or requires officials to do with Donald Trump's name on the general election ballot after the Republican Party nominates him for President. 1. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Donald J. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
But the occasion of the Colorado Supreme Court's decision in Anderson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm
Anderson, the Supreme Court case addressing the issue of whether Donald Trump is disqualified from the presidency under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
House of Representatives and the Senate already have determined that Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 “warrants … disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Anderson, the case involving Donald Trump's potential disqualification under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Anderson—contend that Trump is disqualified to serve as President. [read post]
