Search for: "Downs v. Correctional Medical Services" Results 21 - 40 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2020, 11:31 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The Sixth Circuit joins the Eighth Circuit in recognizing the import of Chief Justice Roberts' controlling opinion in June Medical Services] On Friday, in EMW Women's Surgical Center, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 Service of ProcessIn 2019, there was a plethora of cases that were dismissed due to a plaintiff’s failure to properly or timely complete service of original process.The latest appellate court review of the application of the Lamp v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Reproductive rights advocates and activists breathed a collectively sigh of relief when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 26293 (SD CA, Feb. 26, 2013), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that suspension of Protestant group prayer services, fellowship and ministry classes during the prison lock downs violated his rights under RLUIPA.In Toland v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 110146, July 30, 2015) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that defendant ordered the Sunday school service of the Moorish Science Temple of America closed down after only 10 to 13 minutes because of a shortage of officers for security for the chapel.In Hoeck v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
This morning, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm by Melissa Murray
’” Likewise, in an early motion in June Medical Services v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  Over the past year, a number of decisions have been handed down at both the trial court and appellate level analyzing the application of the Lamp v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Jan. 31, 2019)After the panel opinion striking down SF’s sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) disclosure was reheard by the en banc court in light of National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
For the Tribune News Service (via Governing), Jessica Wehrman reports on the court’s grant Tuesday in Husted v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm by Brian A. Comer
  This case is a medical malpractice case, not a products liability case. [read post]