Search for: "Dr Richter" Results 1 - 20 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 12:40 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Zum Teil wird auf Getty Images als angebliche Bildquelle verwiesen.Anwaltskollege Dr. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm by Jon L. Gelman
  Shields AM, Faustini SE, Kristunas CA, Cook AM, Backhouse C, Dunbar L, Ebanks D, Emmanuel B, Crouch E, Kröger A, Hirschfeld J, Sharma P, Jaffery R, Nowak S, Gee S, Drayson MT, Richter AG, Dietrich T, Chapple ILC. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Biogen and Samsung Bioepis / Richter Gedeon Nyrt, District Court of The Hague 29 August 2020 (Judges Kokke, Knijff and Schüller) [Dutch decision here]In a case between pharmaceutical companies Biogen c.s. and Richter, the District Court of The Hague considered how an auxiliary request filed by Richter with proceedings pending affects the invalidity discussion. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Hoffmann Eitle have therefore joined with six other renowned patent attorney firms and filed a joint amicus curiae brief to the EPO, accompanied by a legal opinion of Justice Professor Dr. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Hoffmann Eitle have therefore joined with six other renowned patent attorney firms and filed a joint amicus curiae brief to the EPO, accompanied by a legal opinion of Justice Professor Dr. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
Turning to de minimis, Arnold LJ noted that it was common ground that his own statement of the law in Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) was accurate, and analysed whether three “groups” of infringement were de minimis. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:11 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
UPDATE: This blogpost was updated later on 23 December 2020 to include the reaction of the FCC to questions of the author and to add the remark about Dr Stjerna’s website. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:44 am by Thomas Musmann (Rospatt Osten Pross)
By Dr Simon Klopschinski As reported previously on this blog, the German ratification process for the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPC) has been started anew after the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) had declared the previous ratification act void because it had not been approved by parliament with the required 2/3 majority. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:38 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
In Germany the re-ratification process of the Unified Patent Court Agreement – which is necessary after the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) partially upheld a complaint last March and declared the first ratification procedure invalid – is progressing rapidly. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:14 am by Roya Ghafele (OxFirst)
Dr Roya Ghafele is the Managing Director of Oxfirst Ltd, a law and economics consultancy She has held Lectureships (Assistant Prof. in the US Academy) in international IP law and international political economy with Oxford and Edinburgh University and served as an economist to the United Nation’s World Intellectual Property Organization, the OECD and McKinsey. [read post]