Search for: "Duke Investors"
Results 81 - 100
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
Steven Schwarcz (Duke) pins blame on the complexity of financial products like asset-backed securities. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
It also has profound implications for the firm’s behavior and investor outcomes. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
It also has profound implications for the firm’s behavior and investor outcomes. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Star Distinguished Professor of Law & Business at Duke University School of Law, and Robert Bourret, a class of 2023 J.D. candidate. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued an important class certification decision, and it is not Dukes v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:21 pm
" Duke University's Cox said it was possible that Democratic lawmakers might agree to some new limits on investors' attorneys (such as greater disclosure of political contributions) in an effort to win Republican support for new legislation. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
This post is based on a recent article by Professor Simkovic, forthcoming in the Duke Law Journal. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
, published recently in Duke Law School’s Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems, argues that the directors of publicly held companies in the United States should be subject to a new state law duty requiring them to explain to shareholders how the board is exercising business judgment and acting in the best interests of the corporation. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
In a mere decade, we managed to allow a “free markets” ideology on steroids to gut investor and borrower protection. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 7:12 am
Mark Weidemaier & Mitu Gulati Both of us are teaching 1L Contracts online this semester and fear we also may have to do the same for our joint Duke/UNC sovereign debt class next semester. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:15 am
James Cox, a securities law professor at Duke University, said he believes that a marketwide access mandate would be “highly vulnerable” to a lawsuit that asserts such a rule is beyond the agency’s authority to regulate corporate proxy disclosures. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 2:41 pm
Duke University's Cox also noted that Mack's decision not to accept a bonus in 2007 also dampened potential opposition. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Political Landscape Posted by George Dallas and Kerrie Waring, International Corporate Governance Network, on Friday, March 31, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compliance & ethics, Dodd-Frank Act, Donald Trump, ESG, FCPA, Financial regulation, Institutional Investors, Institutional monitoring, International governance, Investor horizons, Presidential elections, Securities regulation, Systemic risk, Taxation How Delaware May Be Dethroned and Why It Should Not Posted by… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:05 am
“America’s investors and markets will continue to benefit from his capable leadership, consensus-oriented approach, and excellent judgment. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Dukes (docket 10-277), a decision likely to be issued within the next three weeks. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:01 am
Schwarcz (Duke University), on Wednesday, November 4, 2020 Editor's Note: Steven L. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:02 am
Christopher Duke Bennet (CRD#: 2510231) is a former registered broker and investment advisor whose last employer was J.J.B. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:57 am
In fact, the VIX is the most widely used volatility index, and was introduced by Duke University Professor Dr. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:48 am
Macey (Yale), on Friday, July 23, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Duke Energy, Engagement, Firm performance, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Management, Shareholder activism Commenters Weigh in on SEC Climate Disclosures Request for Public Input Posted by Gabriel Rosenberg, Margaret Tahyar, and Betty Huber, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, July 24, 2021 Tags: Climate change, Environmental… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:08 am
Some commentators have responded to this allegation on the merits, arguing that the proposals submitted by investors working with Harvard's Shareholder Rights Project are not materially misleading in their characterization or research on classified boards or in any other way. [read post]
