Search for: "Duty v. Buchanan County Public Schools" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
For publication opinions today (5): In 600 Land Development, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although the Supreme Court held that a state could not simply privatize its public schools and thereby evade Brown’s desegregation mandate (because the schools remained public in key respects), in Palmer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
May 14, 2007).Not only that, courts applying Alabama law have rejected market share liability, Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
DeSoto County Mississippi, No. 08-60004 (5th Cir. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 00274 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which granted Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC’s motion to fix the amount of its charging lien against plaintiff based upon an account stated, Nonparty respondent Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (BIR) submitted proof that it entered into a retainer agreement with plaintiff and sent her regular invoices to which she did not object during the course of the firm’s year-long engagement. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 00274 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which granted Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC’s motion to fix the amount of its charging lien against plaintiff based upon an account stated, Nonparty respondent Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (BIR) submitted proof that it entered into a retainer agreement with plaintiff and sent her regular invoices to which she did not object during the course of the firm’s year-long engagement. [read post]