Search for: "E Merck" Results 81 - 100 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2010, 10:16 pm
Click here, and it will take you to a page containing biographical and contact information and here to e-mail Will directly. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 9:48 pm
Perhaps most critically, the Supreme Court’s Merck v. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 8:12 am
* Trusts and estates lawyer Kenneth Page, to Hughes Hubbard & Reed, from Coudert Brothers (where he headed their T&E practice). [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Data from the first of those trials is expected later in 2013, Bristol-Myers said in an e-mail. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:58 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Some circuit cases cited by the Court and amici can conceivably be read as interpreting the language Lampf adopted from §78i(e) as imposing some form of constructive discovery. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 11:27 am
[footnotes omitted] Lastly as regards Fosamax and ONJ, which is sometimes referred to as "phossy jaw", from the November 2008 edition of the Journal of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, we have a brief article by Robert E. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  E. coli O157:H7 infection is also linked to the development of post-infectious Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
Written by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA [2021] SGCA 14, a full bench of the Singapore Court of Appeal addressed the limits of transnational issue estoppel in Singapore law, and flagged possible fundamental changes to the common law on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Singapore. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:55 pm
Another dealt with computer systems and databases for managing product data.Elan moved for summary judgment, arguing that even if its conduct fell within the scope of the patents, it is immune from patent infringement under the "safe harbor" provision of 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(1), because the results of the research were submitted to the FDA under a Citizen Petition and labeling supplement pursuant to a New Drug Application.Under 271(e)(1), no infringement can be found when the… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:34 am
Indeed, this product is very much a case of E pluribus unum (“One out of the many”), the motto on the Great Seal of the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:05 am
Merck & Co., 653 F.3d 95, 100-01 (2d Cir. 2011), involved consolidated products liability actions brought by prescription drug users against a drug manufacturer. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:32 am by Sandy
Code Ann. 8.01-229(E)(1) permit tolling of a state statute of limitations due to the pendency of a putative class action in another jurisdiction? [read post]