Search for: "E Merck"
Results 161 - 180
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
In just the last few months, Google has been caught bypassing Safari's Do Not Track setting, and was slapped with a (minuscule) fine for obstructing a case investigating its Street View vans to that collected data from unsecured WiFi networks (including e-mail addresses and webpage requests). [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:11 am
"Frederic E. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:18 pm
Charles E. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:09 am
The manufacturers and marketers involved include Sanofi Aventis, Warner Chilcott, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:13 am
Describing the casus belli on the IP Tango weblog, the IPKat's friend José Carlos Vaz e Dias writes: "The conflicts involving Brazil started back in November/December 2009 when a shipment of 500 kilos of the generic drug Losartan® was seized at the Rotterdam port. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:01 am
Aminolroaya has been appointed to serve as plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel in the Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) Products Liability Litigation by the honorable Judge Gene E. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
The IPOS (the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore) sends a seasonal patent e-card produced by the Patent Analytics team at IPOS International! [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:19 pm
That assumption is incorrect, for the Court in Merck confirmed that “[e]ach of the accused activities must be evaluated separately to determine whether the exemption applies. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:33 am
See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:17 am
As part of the agreement Merck must submit all new TV commercials for its drugs to the FDA for review before they can be aired. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm
Merck & Co. 924 F.Supp. 2d 477, 497 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Pritchett v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
This ruling (and the analysis provided in this post, written by me) defines a new generation of hosting providers held eligible to benefit of the E-Commerce Directive safe harbour. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:21 am
§ 156(e)(2). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
"You're not going to get a deal done by e-mail," Fallon told them firmly. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
"You're not going to get a deal done by e-mail," Fallon told them firmly. [read post]
