Search for: "E. W.D. G." Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Belief in the need for education for citizenship in constitutional democracy further expanded through an array of American civic thought and leadership, from John Dewey to Anna Julia Cooper and Carter G. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am by Eric Goldman
  In dicta, however, it suggested that everyday conversation ordinarily should not be the subject of copyright: [W]e should be wary about excluding all possibility of protecting a speaker’s right to decide when his words, uttered in private dialogue, may or may not be published at large. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Progressive Advanced Insurance, No. 2:21-CV-01916-AJS (W.D. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
For application of a TTC in the assessment of acceptable limits of mutagenic impurities in drug substances and drug products, a value of 1.5 micrograms (µg)/day corresponding to a theoretical 10-5 excess lifetime risk of cancer can be justified. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Here’s the argument: The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure provide (with emphasis added): In a chapter 7 case, on expiration of the times fixed for objecting to discharge and for filing a motion to dismiss the case under Rule 1017(e), the court shall forthwith grant the discharge, except that the court shall not grant the discharge if: (A) the debtor is not an individual; (B) a complaint, or a motion under §727(a)(8) or (a)(9), objecting to the discharge has been filed and… [read post]