Search for: "E. W.D. G." Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
., 289 F.Supp. 2d 1230, 1236 n.1 (W.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
As noted above, the courts have routinely found the victim depicted was harmed by the offender’s possession of the images depicting their abuse.16 Despite the consistency among the courts in finding harm to the victims, the courts have split on whether, and how much restitution to award the victims depicted in the imagery; amounts vary between full restitution,17 de minimus restitution,18 and no restitution.19 The difference in outcome turns on the courts’ causation… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
Feb. 16, 1996) (“[g]iven the lack of evidence that [the prescriber] ever consulted or relied on defendants’ package insert warnings in treating plaintiff, it cannot be said that those warnings played any role in the doctor’s decision to prescribe”); William Beaumont Hospital v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Scripps Networks Interactive, LLC, 2011 WL 1750711 (W.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus “[w]e do not believe comment k was intended to provide nor should it provide all ethical drugs with blanket immunity from strict liability design defect claims. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm by Kenneth S. Nankin
§ 1030(g), under which victims of computer fraud or abuse can assert claims against violators of the statute. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
There are few things worse for a business than starting the day with FBI agents at the door demanding to search the files and computers with a search warrant in hand. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
I am very happy to present this guest post by Kristin Grossman. [read post]