Search for: "E. W.D. G." Results 81 - 90 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
., 289 F.Supp. 2d 1230, 1236 n.1 (W.D. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
My email inbox has gotten out of control, and I had to declare partial email bankruptcy. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
Lee also described in detail the protocol that the Debtors would use to determine whether to make payments to Critical Vendors if the Motion were approved by the Court: [I]n identifying the Critical Vendors, the Debtors examined each of their vendor or service provider relationships with the following five general criteria in mind: (a) whether a particular vendor is a sole-source or limited-source supplier or service provider of the quality and quantity required by the Debtors in a particular… [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
As noted above, the courts have routinely found the victim depicted was harmed by the offender’s possession of the images depicting their abuse.16 Despite the consistency among the courts in finding harm to the victims, the courts have split on whether, and how much restitution to award the victims depicted in the imagery; amounts vary between full restitution,17 de minimus restitution,18 and no restitution.19 The difference in outcome turns on the courts’ causation… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
Feb. 16, 1996) (“[g]iven the lack of evidence that [the prescriber] ever consulted or relied on defendants’ package insert warnings in treating plaintiff, it cannot be said that those warnings played any role in the doctor’s decision to prescribe”); William Beaumont Hospital v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am by Eric Goldman
  In dicta, however, it suggested that everyday conversation ordinarily should not be the subject of copyright: [W]e should be wary about excluding all possibility of protecting a speaker’s right to decide when his words, uttered in private dialogue, may or may not be published at large. [read post]