Search for: "E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co"
Results 41 - 60
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2017, 5:46 am
In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:24 am
Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
”) Anticipation/Obviousness: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
Extraterritoriality – Trade Secrecy: Sino Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:41 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., December 13, 2016, Smith, J.). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
[DataTreasuryPetition] Extraterritoriality – Trade Secrecy: Sino Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 9:03 am
Dupont De Nemours & Co. and Adecco USA, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Jurisdiction: GeoTag, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
DuPont de Nemours and Co., October 7, 2016, Rendell, M.). [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:16 am
Dupont De Nemours and Co., et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Patent Attorney Malpractice: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Patent Attorney Malpractice: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Laches: Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:40 am
In addition, MacDermid’s Digital CST printing plates did not infringe another DuPont patent (E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
The basic problem in In re M-I is that the trial judge never considered any countervailing interests that the plaintiff had in protecting the secrets during the court proceeding.It is a little curious that the Court in its Fourteenth Amendment analysis never cited E.I. duPont de Nemours Powder Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
Co., Inc., 2016 BL 163642, Cal., No. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:22 am
DuPont de Nemours and Company and Corning, Incorporated, as well as an expert on trade secret law, and a professor specializing in trade secret academia. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 636 F.3d 88, 100 (4th Cir.), cert. [read post]
