Search for: "E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co"
Results 61 - 80
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 1:42 pm
(Solvent) sued two adjoining property owners, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:00 pm
Last year, the Florida Supreme Court disbarred one lawyer and suspended another for two years for taking a $6.4 million fee from the defense to file no more cases against E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 1:27 am
Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:41 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., December 13, 2016, Smith, J.). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:27 pm
E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 906 A.2d 787 (Del. 2006). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
Dupont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:57 pm
” The firm represented E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., which won a $919.9 million judgment in September against Kolon Industries. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:33 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:38 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 2008 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:11 am
DuPont De Nemours, 2014 WL 5048950 (N.J.Super.A.D.) [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:35 am
And Grassley criticized Motley Rice for a controversy in which E.I Dupont De Nemours and Co. paid $12 million to resolve lead-paint litigation, and $2.5 million of it went to a hospital with close ties to Motley Rice. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:44 am
DuPont de Nemours and Co. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:44 am
DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 207 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2006). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
DuPont Nemours & Co., W.D.N.Y., No. 07-CV-0267S(Sr) Weist v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:31 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 2:26 pm
To do so, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board looks to a 13-part test set forth in the seminal case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am
In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
