Search for: "E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2017, 5:46 am by James Hastings
   In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:12 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The basic problem in In re M-I is that the trial judge never considered any countervailing interests that the plaintiff had in protecting the secrets during the court proceeding.It is a little curious that the Court in its Fourteenth Amendment analysis never cited E.I. duPont de Nemours Powder Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:27 pm by James Hastings
  The analysis of whether a likelihood of confusion exists has been enunciated in the 13 part test found in the case seminal case  In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:31 pm
DuPont De Nemours & Co., 173 P3d 1021 (Haw, 2007) (Plaintiffs could sue for difference between actual settlement and a more fair value for which they would have bargained had they been aware of scientific data indicating contamination of fungicide, which data defendants withheld during discovery.); Bogy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 1:05 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
DuPont De Nemours & Co., 761 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2000) (holding that contractual choice-of-law provisions are presumptively valid and enforceable in Florida unless the law of the chosen forum contravenes strong public policy). [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 12:51 pm by James Hastings
  In doing so, the Board relies of the factors set forth in E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:05 am by Carter Wood
DuPont De Nemours, striking all of DuPont's defenses in a case alleging that a formulation of the company's fungicide Benlate(TM) harmed part of the shrimp population in Ecuador in the early 1990s. [read post]