Search for: "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co." Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2021, 3:36 am by Jon L. Gelman
E,I, du Pont de Nemours & Company, 226 N.J.Super. 572, 545 A.2d 213 (App.Div.1988), judgment aff'd 115 N.J. 252, 558 A.2d 461 (1989). 9.22 Gelman, Jon L, Workers’ Compensation Law, 38 NJPRAC 9.22 (Thomson-Reuters 2021). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am by Wayne Reinke
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am by Wayne Reinke
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 4:31 pm by Sean Wajert
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 994 F.3d 791 (7th Cir. 2021). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Some notes on vexing issue, which fortunately has never serious issue for me. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 3:51 am by Peter J. Sluka
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 584 A2d 490, 509 [Del Ch 1990], the Court rejected a valuation analysis that compared adjusted book value to market price as “akin to comparing apples to oranges. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 784 F.3d 1189, 1197 (Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 3:41 pm by Jon L. Gelman
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, 101 N.J. 161, 501 A.2d 505 (1985), appeal after remand 226 N.J.Super. 572, 545 A.2d 213 (App.Div.1988), certif. granted 113 N.J. 377, 550 A.2d 480 (1988). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm by dbllawyers
  References [6] In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).[7] In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:23 am by Jon L. Gelman
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161 (1985) as narrowing the circumstances when the intentional wrong exemption applies in recognition that reckless or negligent conduct often reflects a "deliberate" business decision by employers to promote speed and efficiency at the expense of workplace safety. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Raymark Industies, that its previous 1985 decision was binding, even though the Willis case involved employees of E.I. du Pont & Nemours Company, a different employer from the court’s previous case.[2] The legal irony was thick. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 501 A. 2d 505 (1985). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Additionally, other non co-workers (bystanders), who were exposed from the ill employee’s worksite may also have claims.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by Nikki Siesel
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am by Jon L. Gelman
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION, 939 F. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
He received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, a master’s degree in chemistry from the University of Delaware, and a law degree from Georgetown University.He spent 36 years with E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., at the time the world’s largest chemical company. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Jon L. Gelman
Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 118 N.J.L. 404, 193 A. 194 (1937), aff'd 119 N.J.L. 427, 197 A. 276 (Err. [read post]