Search for: "E.I. du pont de Nemours and Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Prior to entering public service, Judge Johnson was a Senior Counsel at E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company for six years. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Companies and their D&O insurers must now assume that the chance of any given U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Companies and their D&O insurers must now assume that the chance of any given U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION, 939 F. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 10:02 am
Merrell Dow Pharms. and the Texas Supreme Court in E.I. du Pont de Nemours v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:40 pm
In the latest example of this type of litigation, a plaintiff shareholder has now filed a securities suit against The Chemours Company, a chemical company that spun out of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) in July 2015. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
He received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, a master’s degree in chemistry from the University of Delaware, and a law degree from Georgetown University.He spent 36 years with E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., at the time the world’s largest chemical company. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 10:28 am
To establish a Section 2(d) case for likelihood of confusion, the Board undertakes the 13-part test found in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:14 am
Du Pont De Nemours, Louisville Works, October 11, 2018). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 2:26 pm
To do so, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board looks to a 13-part test set forth in the seminal case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973) (the “DuPont Factors”). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:09 pm
In Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases, the plaintiff must establish the presence of a likelihood of confusion between the parties’ trademarks pursuant to the thirteen factors set forth in the case of In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:20 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, 101 N.J. 161, 501 A.2d 505 (1985), appeal after remand 226 N.J.Super. 572, 545 A.2d 213 (App.Div.1988), judgment aff'd 115 N.J. 252, 558 A.2d 461 (1989). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Du Pont de Nemours, Louisville Works, (August 26, 2016) (DuPont)—where a divided Board held that actions consistent with an established past practice constitute a change, and therefore require the employer to provide the union with notice and an opportunity to bargain prior to implementation, if the past practice was created under a management-rights clause in a CBA that has expired, or if the disputed actions involved employer discretion. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
Costle and E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:25 pm
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company obtained information suggesting that Mr. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:57 am
In determining whether there was a likelihood of confusion, the Board, as usual, applied the factors identified in the In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
”) Anticipation/Obviousness: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
