Search for: "ED MOLONEY"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Does the Minister [Ed Vaizey, culture minister] recognise that the proposals being put forward by Lord Hunt, chair of the Press Complaints Commission, fail to meet either of those tests? [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:47 pm
The first excerpt I quoted motivated a post by Chris Bray, maybe the web’s leading advocate for Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, asserting (in its title no less) that “the people who ratified the US-UK MLAT think the DOJ is wrong about what the treaty means. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, David Rivkin, Jr. and Lee Casey argue that an opinion upholding the mandate would “forever warp the federal-state division of authority. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Yesterday Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre filed their reply brief in their appeal of Judge Young’s denial of their motion for leave to intervene and his dismissal of their claims against Attorney General Holder. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:43 pm
The government has filed its brief in the appeal Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre took from Judge Young’s decision denying their motion for leave to intervene in Boston College’s attempt to quash the government’s subpoenas for the Belfast Project interviews. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
Marlou Schrover and Deidre Moloney (eds.) [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:03 pm
Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre have appealed from Judge Young’s decision dismissing their complaint against the government. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
“Hot tubbing” featured in the Leveson Inquiry at the end of 2011, but it was a sauna that caught the headlines in the first libel trial of the year. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
Indeed, even Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntrye, the two folks who are, as of now, continuing the fight in the courts, don’t really focus on the privilege issue, but rather on the more narrow and technical issue of whether the Attorney General complied with the mutual legal assistance treaty under which the UK authorities have sought American judicial assistance. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:30 pm
Ed. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:15 am
The mutual legal assistance treaty between the United States and the United Kingdon Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre’s complaint Moloney & McIntyre’s memorandum in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction The government’s memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss and in opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction Moloney & McIntyre’s memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss The government’s… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:27 pm
This may be satisfactory to Boston College, but will it be satisfactory to Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, the Belfast Project researchers who have mounted their own legal and political fight against the subpoenas? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:58 pm
Mary Daly of University College, Dublin (13:51) and followed by an interview with Eamon Dornan, the lawyer for Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre (at 24:05), and Alan Shatter, the Irish government’s Minister of Justice and Equality (29:45). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:05 pm
Eastern time (that’s 7 p.m. for those of you in Ireland) on January 24, Judge Young will be holding a hearing on the government’s motion to dismiss the complaint Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre have brought against the Attorney General. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:43 pm
Moloney, deserve the blame? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
This is probably what the lawyer for Anthony McIntyre and Ed Moloney of the Belfast Project have to look forward to when Judge Young holds court at BC Law School later this month on the merits of their claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Moloney. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The unsuccessful intervenors, Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre, have appealed to the First Circuit from the order denying their motion for leave to intervene, and from “all subsequent Orders relating thereto.” (Question: can the unsuccessful intervenors appeal from anything other than the denial of their motion for leave to intervene? [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
The main opponents of the subpoena, Anthony McIntyre and Ed Moloney, two of the BC researchers, read the decision as a clear defeat for oral historians, but I say, “Not so fast! [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
A contempt of court ruling against the Birmingham Mail has been overturned by the Court of Appeal, in Birmingham Mail v ED, CA (criminal division) 7 December. [read post]
