Search for: "EMG, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 6:41 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The IMR reviewer noted that applicant had a history of auditory hallucinations, which were ameliorated with Geodon, demonstrating the efficacy of that medication and supporting its medical necessity. [ LexisNexis Commentary: This IMR is particularly interesting because the medication Geodon, which was at issue here, was the subject of a $301 million settlement between Pfizer, Inc. and the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
(Baker, Derek), Lexis Presumption of Compensability—Heart Trouble—Correctional Officers—Anti-Attribution—WCAB, denying reconsideration, affirmed decision in which WCJ found that applicant sustained industrial injury to his cardiovascular system in form of hypertension and to his right eye while employed as parole agent during period 12/27/2010 to 4/28/2021, and that permanent disability related to applicant’s right eye injury, which resulted from obstruction of retinal… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm by Robert Liles
Is Your Urogynecology, OB/GYN or Multidisciplinary Practice Prepared for a Medicare Biofeedback Claims Audit or a Pelvic Floor Therapy Claims Audit? [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm by Robert Liles
Is Your Urogynecology, OB/GYN or Multidisciplinary Practice Prepared for a Medicare Biofeedback Claims Audit or a Pelvic Floor Therapy Claims Audit? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
To recap, this case involves claims to heart rate monitors on exercise equipment that determine heart rate by detecting electrocardiograph ("ECG") and subtracting the confounding electromyogram ("EMG") signals. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
    Author Michael Stack, Principal of Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 9:09 am by RatnerPrestia
”15 Defendants argued that this phrase was indefinite because there was no standard against which the phrase “substantially unique” could be measured.16 The Special Master disagreed with the Defendants in his report and concluded that the term was definite because “substantially unique” meant unique enough to distinguish one portable module from another portable module.17 The district court subsequently adopted the Special Master’s report on this issue.18… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
Further, the EMG signals detected by the two electrode pairs are to be “of substan­tially equal magnitude and phase” so that the difference amplifier will “produce a substantially zero [EMG] signal” upon subtracting the signals from one another.Nautilus, Inc. at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).Markman HearingIn 2011, the District Court conducted a hearing to determine the proper construction of the patent’s claims, see Markman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:51 am by Ronald Mann
In the next stage of its continuing quest to reexamine every significant aspect of the Federal Circuit’s doctrinal framework for patents, the Court in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]