Search for: "EMPLOYERS I-X"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
I was privileged to present today on cutting-edge class action litigation issues at the American Conference Institute program on Employment Discrimination Litigation. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
This ruling means that the employer of the man, known as Xavier X, will have to pay hefty compensation to his dependents. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
” WORKWEEK AVERAGING APPROVED In a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Mary I. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:56 pm
Economic Inquiry, Volume 47 Issue 2 , Pages 197 – 393 (April 2009) DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00154.x The post Early Employment Mediation: Timing Matters appeared first on The Blog of Steven Mehta. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Nothing in that case suggests Judge Posner would have applied the continued employment doctrine to a fact-pattern in which the employee was the one who elected to end the relationship.To recap, mathematically speaking:(district court case X 1) + (dicta in Seventh Circuit case X 1) ≠ (consistent decisions of this court on continued employment doctrine X approximately 19) + (common sense X infinity)The majority (which curiously never… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Some parts of the Bill are organized similar to the Canada Labour Code, from employment standards to health and safety, to unionized workplaces, as follows: PART I: Preliminary Matters PART II: Employment Standards PART III: Occupational Health and Safety PART IV: Appeals and Hearings re: Parts II and III PART V: Radiation Health and Safety PART VI: Labour Relations PART VII: Public Service Essential Services (Place Holder) PART VIII: Labour-Management Actions (Temporary… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:45 am
Pollick J. neatly set out his calculation of prejudgment interest, as follows: This Court’s calculation of appropriate prejudgment interest on a monthly basis prior to the expiry of the notice period in this case as follows: (i) Annual Salary of $98,824.00/ 12= $8235.33 a month Interest Calculated Monthly: Month 1 $8235.33 x 4.5% per annum for 14 months $432.32 Month 2 $8235.33 x 4.5% per annum for 13 months $401.44 Month 3 … [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:09 am
As I reported, a jury found that the employer violated the FMLA when it denied Pat leave, and Read More... [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
I am wondering if this is something employers are able to do? [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
“X. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Additionally, smaller claims have a bigger impact in calculating experience modifications, or X-Mods, and the premiums that employers ultimately pay. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:39 am
Should litigation arise from the construction, enforcement or breach of this Contract, parties agree the Circuit Court of X County will be proper jurisdiction.. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 11:20 am
In my last post, I discussed the administrative process for employment discrimination claims. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:24 pm
I’m not sure why employers feel the need to have mandatory computer training for new hires, especially when those new hires are a part of generation X (or whatever they call us nowadays). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 11:32 pm
My friend and ADA expert, David Fram, noted several lessons in a LinkedIn post earlier this week, and I think they’re worth using as a guide when approaching these situations: I agree with David in all respects and, in particular, on a few points: Employers can (and should) assess “undue hardship” earlier in the process. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
I agree that a judge may highlight a possible anomaly in the law, or possible unintended consequences of legislation, and even state that the law should be changed (as happened in the X. case). [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:07 am
The research shows that millennials and Gen Z workers have a harder time with mental health compared to Baby Boomers and Generation X. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:00 pm
Scheduling of earned sick leave may only be required in advance if the need for the leave is foreseeable – and in those limited instances, an employer may (x) require 7 days’ advance notice of the need and duration of the leave, (y) request reasonable efforts be undertaken to schedule the leave in a manner that does not disrupt the employer’s business operations, and (z) prohibit use of sick leave on certain dates (the “black-out dates”). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
I present this to your without further comment. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:00 am
” Mr X v TJX Canada/Winners Merchants International, 2013 CanLII 68260 (ON LRB) [read post]
