Search for: "EPC Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2020, 6:30 am
An enhanced corporation mechanism is a procedure which allows a minimum of nine EU member states to work together in a certain area. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:30 am
Corporate IP Policies and Enhanced Damages Although commentators have condemned the practice,[25] some organizations have adopted policies that prohibit review of third-party patents to protect against enhanced damages. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
Taking into account of amended claim 6, claims 1 to 14 of auxiliary request 1 met the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 12:57 pm
Article 87(1) EPC merely requires that all of the applicants of P1 are also applicants of A1 (or their successor in title). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
I'm still grateful for a very interesting conversation on a train ride from Bayreuth to Nuremberg after a conference, so I don't want to criticize the Federal Court of Justice for a decision that I regard as inconsistent with the letter and the spirit of Article 52 EPC. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:33 am
In 2016, well after the expiry of the opposition period, the Korean chemical company KCC Corporation filed an intervention under Article 105(1)(a) EPC. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:18 pm
NextDecade Corporation (NextDecade) announced that it has signed two contracts with Bechtel Oil, Gas and Chemicals (Bechtel) for the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) of NextDecade’s proposed Rio Grande LNG export project in Brownsville, Texas. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
It also raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and for lack of novelty against the auxiliary request.It attached to its letter the following new item of evidence:D35: Copy of the Mr T B van Aken's publicly available entry in the "Linkedin" database.XI. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
The Supreme Court was asked to decide in November 2018, when it heard the appeal by Actavis Group PTC EHF and Ors (the Respondents) against ICOS Corporation and Anor (the Appellants). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am
Further, all divisions of Bose, including the assumed infringers and interveners Bose GmbH and Bose Limited, were legally inextricably linked to the Bose Corporation. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:15 am
No surprise, Google and Facebook are pushing back hard with all their multinational corporate lobbying power. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
Further, all divisions of Bose, including the assumed infringers and interveners Bose GmbH and Bose Limited, were legally inextricably linked to the Bose Corporation. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
(...)IIReasons for the Decision:11.1 Admissibility of Oppositions:34 All of the oppositions filed within the opposition period meet the requirements of Articles 99(1) & 100 EPC and of Rules 3(1) and 76 EPC. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:12 pm
Hill & Smith [1982] RPC 183; Improver Corporation v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
Therefore, what the member states earn in official fees, they will typically lose in corporate or income taxes. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm
As the contested decision was favourable in respect of this sole request, the Proprietor was not adversely affected by the decision and consequently the Proprietor's appeal is to be rejected as inadmissible, Article 107 EPC and Rule 101(1) EPC. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm
As the contested decision was favourable in respect of this sole request, the Proprietor was not adversely affected by the decision and consequently the Proprietor's appeal is to be rejected as inadmissible, Article 107 EPC and Rule 101(1) EPC. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
| Saturday Sundries | [week ending Sunday 19 November] Birss J in Accord v Research Corporation Technologies attempts to cut the red tape on the right to claim priority | Looking for answers on ANSERA | Speech from European Judges Forum: But Sir Robin, let's be frank, we will put (just to be short), in Milan the Central Court... [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
talks, in turn, about director's moral rights.Weekly Roundups: Saturday Sundries[Week ending 19 November]Birss J in Accord v Research Corporation Technologies attempts to cut the red tape on the right to claim priorityThe AmeriKat Annsley invites Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) to report on the recent decision of Birss J in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 addressing the issue of patent priority date. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
The applicant (appellant), which at the time was Microsoft Corporation, appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No. 01123065.3.II. [read post]
