Search for: "EPC Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
After the Technical BoA dismissed the appeal against the rejection of the opposition in oral proceedings, Gates appealed and cited the grounds recited in Art. 112a EPC, namely that a fundamental violation of Art. 113 EPC had occurred --the right to be heard. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
T 0568/10 A patent in the name of Nippon Steel Corporation was opposed by Tata Steel. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:15 am
The Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys claims that the European regulations favour companies from the United States, Asia and large European corporations. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:34 pm
., Kellogg Brown & Root, and JGC Corporation (collectively paying over $1.6 billion, as discussed by Richard Cassin in The FCPA Blog). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
… The name, address and nationality of the Appellant is (emphasised by the Board): ZENON ENVIRONMENTAL INC 845 Harrington Court Burlington Ontario L7N 3P3 Canada ZENON ENVIRONMENTAL INC is a Canadian Corporation. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
“Corporate” in Figure 16) in one dimension (e.g. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:13 pm
On our corporate IP law blog ksnh::law, we published a series of articles documenting the latest developments of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court in Europe: JURI mandates Rapporteurs to Negotiate Unitary Patent with EU Council Behind Closed Doors (25 Nov '11), Rushing To Set Up The EU Unified Patent Court (24 Nov '11), JURI Legal Committee Of The European Parliament Deals With EU Unitary Patent (24 Nov '11). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:27 am
Attorneys Duff Bryant, Ed Einowski and Julia Pettit will moderate discussion panels covering the Corporate M&A Landscape, Renewable Developers’ Perspectives, and Wind M&A Deals. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm
Nonetheless, Catnic (and its UK progeny Improver Corporation v Remington Consumer Products Ltd [1990] FSR 181) have previously received some degree of approval in the Australian courts. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
With those difficulties as a primary contributing factor, investors, corporations, and clinics shifted their research from Europe to the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:11 am
Cannone Chairs the Gibbons Corporate Department. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Boston Scientific Corporation, et. al. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) announced this week that it has settled a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) investigation of the Japanese firm JGC Corporation. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Press Controls (Patently-O) BPAI: Orita doctrine blocks patent reissue: Ex parte Gotto et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisonsin: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute do not violate appointments clause or take care clause of U.S. constitution: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
However, it is also stated, in view of the findings of another Board in case T 686/97 […]:“The provision of a “redundant” or “failsafe system” is an essential component of a normally satisfactory reminder system in corporate departments. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
SEB (Patently-O) United Technologies Corporation – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-751) regarding Certain Turbomachinery Blades, Engines (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright Public Knowledge proposes plan to modernize copyright office (Public Knowledge) University of Michigan releases bibliographic records into public domain via CC0 (Creative Commons) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Massachusetts grants summary judgment in cook book copyright case: Hassett v Hasselbeck (The… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Not Faber-Castell (IPKat) US Patents – Decisions Check the corporate records – every time: CAFC decision in Tri-Star Elecs. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
Opponent 2 raised objections under Article 100(a), (b) and (c) EPC 1973. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 2:40 pm
The European Patent Judges' Symposium appears to be a rather exclusive corporation since, besides an official press release on the EPO website and today's posting on the usually very well informed ipeg blog, no substantive information on the meeting seems to be available throughout the whole internet. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(G 1/10) (IPKat) Another referral to the EBO, allowability of disclaimers (G 01/03) (IPKat) EPO: English version of notice concerning communications under amended Rule 161 EPC (IPKat) Eased patent translation requirements proposed in Europe (Inovia IP) (Patentology) Bloggers or Blaggers? [read post]
