Search for: "EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
NetChoice and CCIA filed lawsuits against portions of both laws, and federal district courts in both Florida and Texas granted injunctions. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Carry outside the home is the norm throughout most of the country, including many large urban areas, such as the District of Columbia, Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia, San Juan, Seattle, and Houston. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 11:36 am by Aimee Guthat
In the third suit, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Lincoln & the Negroes: The Long Road to Equality  (1963) William Rehnquist, Civil Liberty and the Civil War (1997) Similarly, some of the Justices were keenly interested and wrote works on religion and related topics: David J. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 6:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Kinston case, LaRoque, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by Kara OBrien
Initially, it appeared that the nomination eligibility requirement would be fairly innocuous considering, as the SEC noted when approving the new rules, it is generally understood that no laws exist in any state or the District of Columbia that prohibit shareholder nomination rights. [read post]