Search for: "ET AL Defendants"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm
The Debtor’s Offending Behavior The Court summarized the content of the adversary complaint filed by the plaintiff: In the underlying District Court action, plaintiff proved during a jury inquest, conducted the 15th day of April, 2002, that during the employment by the defendant/debtor from April 1998 through June 27, 2000 she had been subjected to a regular, frequent, unwanted, uninvited, and abusive pattern of sexually charged behavior, lewd sexual comments,… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 1:40 pm
Pfizer Inc., et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 10:31 am
Shareholder Representative Services, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 13-11962-RGS, the plaintiff, Mercury Systems, […] [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:48 am
Robinson in Anesta AG, et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:59 am
National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n et al, 2017-0098. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:22 am
A large body of research shows that attractive defendants are found guilty less often, and given lighter sentences when found guilty, than unattractive defendants (see, e.g., Burke et al., 1990; Mazzella and Feingold, 1994). [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 10:52 pm
Gonzales, et al. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:39 pm
Khouli et al. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:24 am
This appeal arises from the court’s denial of the defendants’ post-judgment motions and from a single evidentiary ruling at trial. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:12 pm
NORTHWEST HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, and KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:05 am
Inc. et al., C.A. [read post]
Jury returns verdict of validity L-3 Communications Corp. v. Sony Corp., et al., C.A. No. 10-734-RGA
1 Nov 2013, 12:45 pm
Sony Corporation, et al., C.A. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
Nicholson et al., v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 8:01 am
., et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
Lupin Limited, et al., C.A. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:50 am
Leo and Katie Hail-Jares (American University - School of Public Affairs , American University , University of San Francisco - School of Law and American University) have posted Innocent Defendants: Divergent Case... [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
Abizaid et. [read post]
2 May 2013, 7:06 am
SAP AG, et. al. v. [read post]
