Search for: "EUGENE R. SULLIVAN"
Results 1 - 20
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
R. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
[The Minnesota Supreme Court says "sometimes," and splits 4-3 in favor of a particular allegation being on matters of public concern.] [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
Sullivan and Snyder v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:01 am
R. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
The trial of the QAnon follower who allegedly chased Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman during the Jan. 6 attack began yesterday. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
Lakier (who is at the University of Chicago Law School): [R]eturning to the pre-Sullivan standard would create problems of its own. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 1:11 pm
R. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:32 am
Sullivan did hold that an American government can't sue for defamation liability, even for knowing lies, and the same would likely apply to a foreign government. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 279 (1964) (quoting Speiser v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 11:37 am
Sullivan; see Nuxoll ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Sullivan, perhaps the Court's most important free-speech case, arose in this posture. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
Sullivan, the New York Times successfully challenged Alabama libel law rules, on the grounds that they allowed public officials to sue based on honest mistakes of fact (and not just knowing or reckless falsehoods)—but only as a defense to a libel lawsuit, after the suit was filed. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
Fargo Police Officer Charles Sullivan testified he received more than 50 voicemail messages from Roehrich over the course of a year, the messages were insulting and harassing, and many of the messages did not request Sullivan call him back or mention the traffic ticket Sullivan issued to Roehrich's son. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Sullivan (1963), where a state commission threatened to prosecute stores that sold books that it viewed as pornography (including books that were actually protected by the First Amendment). [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Sullivan. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
2299, 2317 (2021); Michael Kent Curtis & Eugene D. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 12:14 pm
Sullivan that effectively prevents public figures from bringing successful defamation claims, as Eugene noted earlier today. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:19 am
But to view Sullivan as a kind of icon … is too easy by half. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
Sullivan (see McKee v. [read post]
