Search for: "EUGENE R. SULLIVAN" Results 21 - 40 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
[I'm continuing to serialize a forthcoming article of mine that discusses (among other things) such a proposed interpretation of libel law.] [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, protected the rights of someone who tried to get wire services to publish his conspiracy theories about "a diabolical plot" against him. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
., decided yesterday by the New York intermediate appellate court (Judges Barbara R. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Eugene Volokh
See Eugene Volokh, Freedom for the Press as an Industry or Technology? [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Cox (9th Cir. 2014) (holding that "the First Amendment defamation rules in Sullivan and its progeny apply equally to the institutional press and individual speakers"). [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 4:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan or else to distinguish that case on the facts and refuse to apply the actual malice rule here. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, the Court held that "actual malice" had to be shown in libel lawsuits by public officials. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan (1964), rejected the view that libel is categorically unprotected. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
., decided by the Massachusetts Appeals Court Tuesday (Sullivan, Kinder & Lemire): The plaintiff is the administrator at the nursing home where the defendant's mother resided. [read post]