Search for: "EUGENE R. SULLIVAN"
Results 41 - 60
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 8:24 am
Sullivan Jr., Harvard Law School Kian Tajbakhsh, Columbia University Zephyr Teachout, Fordham University Cynthia Tucker, University of South Alabama Adaner Usmani, Harvard University Chloe Valdary Lucía Martínez Valdivia, Reed College Helen Vendler, Harvard University Judy B. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 7:47 am
Sullivan (1991), on which Pleasant Grove relied, When Congress established a National Endowment for Democracy to encourage other countries to adopt democratic principles, it was not constitutionally required to fund a program to encourage competing lines of political philosophy such as communism and fascism. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 2:01 pm
Sullivan (1991), on which Pleasant Grove relied, When Congress established a National Endowment for Democracy to encourage other countries to adopt democratic principles, it was not constitutionally required to fund a program to encourage competing lines of political philosophy such as communism and fascism. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:20 am
Sullivan (1963).) [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" R. at 80, ¶ 3. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
[The plaintiffs are claiming, among other things, "group libel. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:04 am
Sullivan (1964), wherein it was observed: "(W)e consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:27 am
Sullivan sitting by designation in District Court issued a fair use opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:43 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 280 (1964)). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 292 (1964); see Karaduman v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:39 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:49 am
Sullivan and Gertz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
[You might also read my earlier post on the subject, Anti-Libel Injunctions and the Criminal Libel Connection and The First Amendment and Criminal Libel Law; or you can read the whole article in PDF.] [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:15 am
Sullivan (1991)). [read post]
