Search for: "Earl Reason" Results 81 - 100 of 976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am by Ronald Mann
The district judge held that Dexter Earl Kemp’s motion seeking to overturn a drug and firearms conviction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:43 am by Leslie Francis
Such physical reductionism is misguided for many reasons, including its failure to understand disability socially. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:34 am by Ronald Mann
In this case, for example, Dexter Earl Kemp filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Frank Cranmer
My detailed reasons will follow later in this judgment; and I would urge anyone interested in the fate of the Rustat memorial, and the life of the College and its chapel, to read them in full. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
Sponsor: Michael Burgess (R-TX) Cosponsors (38 Republicans): Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) Andre Carson (D-IN) Mike Quigley (D-IL) Andy Harris (R-MD) David McKinley (R-WV) Bill Johnson (R-OH) Steve Cohen (D-TN) Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) William Timmons (R-SC) Chris Pappas (D-NH) Fred Upton (R-MI) Mo Brooks (R-AL) Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) Eric Swalwell (D-CA) Ann Kuster (D-NH) Earl “Buddy” Carter (R-GA) Mike Johnson (R-LA) Gregory Steube (R-FL) Jim Costa (D-CA) Rodney… [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
There were "impeach Earl Warren" signs throughout the South after the Court handed down Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:57 am by Simmons Hanly Conroy
It’s for reasons like these that National Asbestos Awareness Week is such an important advocacy effort. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:07 pm by Jamie Markham
Justice Earls concurred in part and dissented in part, writing that she agreed with the majority’s conclusion that defendants who plead guilty are eligible to seek postconviction DNA testing, but that the majority’s materiality analysis placed too high a burden on the defendant. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Associate Justice Anita Earls, in a concurring opinion, acknowledged the supreme court has ineffectively enforced the Batson doctrine. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:49 pm by Ellena Erskine
“There’s no reason that you have to have a court built around an idea,” he said, “that isn’t better, and it isn’t worse. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:40 am by Phil Dixon
The trial court initially found that these reasons were not pretextual and overruled the Batson challenge. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
You arrive at the intent of a person by such just and reasonable deductions from the circumstances proven as a reasonably prudent person would ordinarily draw therefrom. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Earl Warren, like him or not, is remembered as an especially important Chief Justice because of what he helped do on the Court, and no-one diminishes that on the grounds that he was appointed in part for political reasons stemming from the 1952 election. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
Before you could say “He no play-a da game, he no make-a da rules” (Earl Butz's reaction to an earlier Pope refusing to endorse contraception as a means of reducing world hunger), social media lit up with debates about whether the Pope did or did not "have a point. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The case was remanded for reconsideration of the defendant’s remaining argument that prosecution for the assault charges would also violate double jeopardy, which the Court of Appeals declined to address. (1) Conviction for making a threat under G.S. 14-16.7(a) requires proof that it was a “true threat,” meaning that the statement was both objectively threatening to a reasonable recipient and subjectively intended as a threat by the speaker; (2) the state presented… [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Anita Earls dissented as to the retrial, concluding that "[a]n objectively reasonable observer viewing Taylor's Facebook posts in their full context could not understand his messages to contain a serious intention to inflict bodily harm on District Attorney Welch" and that "even if the State had satisfied the objective element, there is insufficient evidence to support the conclusion that Taylor subjectively intended to threaten District Attorney Welch… [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 3:51 pm by lawbod
One reason for the lack of knowledge of the Statute of Westminster may be that the evolutionary process of which it was part was so complicated. [read post]