Search for: "Ed Pennington"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
” Alan Lange & Tom Dawson, Kings of Torts 87 (2d ed. 2010) (quoting convicted former lawyer, Zach Scruggs) Back in the 1980s, I started to see expert witnesses stray into the business of psychoanalysis of corporate defendants. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 10:56 am
The argument is pretty interesting: the Michigan lower courts that have applied Noerr-Pennington to state law claims did so as a matter of First Amendment reasoning directly, rather than constitutional avoidance (the explicit ground on which Noerr-Pennington was decided). [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:10 am
In Greco, … [t]he court [reasoned] that, "I would be prepared to find that false and malicious allegations which lead to the loss of one's children and threaten[ed] the loss of one's liberty are, per se, extreme and outrageous. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:07 am
Cole, David Dana, Ed Dolan, Monika Ehrman, Brian T. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
” Pennington Seed, 80 USPQ2d at 1762. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:04 am
American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, The Noerr-Pennington Doctrine (2022). [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:46 am
But Noerr-Pennington did apply and Neurelis didn’t show that the petition was a sham. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
There was nothing to distinguish UTPCPL “from the many Pennsylvania state law causes of action that courts have found to be subject to Noerr-Pennington. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
” But HumanN sufficiently alleged that ThermoLife “threaten[ed] HumanN with sham litigation, even after [ThermoLife] dismissed its sham infringement suit. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
., Church, State, and Family: Reconciling Traditional Teachings and Modern Liberties, (Journal of Law and Religion 34 (2019): 520-528).John Witte & Justin Latterell, Between Martin Luther and Martin Luther King: James Pennington's Struggle for 'Sacred Human Rights' Against Slavery, (Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2020).Jodok Troy, Legitimacy in the ‘Secular Church’ of the United Nations, (International Relations, 2020).John… [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
The statute: (a) Except as provided under subsection (b) of this section, a public entity shall not: (1) Enter into a contract with a company to acquire or dispose of services, supplies, information technology, or construction unless the contract includes a written certification that the person or company is not currently engaged in, and agrees for the duration of the contract not to engage in, a boycott of Israel; or (2) Engage in boycotts of Israel. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:26 am
The court declined to dismiss the complaint under Noerr-Pennington or under New York’s anti-SLAPP law or litigation privilege. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
This was a fairly straightforward application of something called the Noerr–Pennington doctrine, which says that behavior doesn't violate federal antitrust or labor law when it amounts to petitioning the government as protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
You're going to hate this post. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
Pennington (1965) refer to a dissenting opinion by Justice Brandeis in Duplex Printing Press v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Moreover, the conduct here is not protected under the "absolutist position" that Noerr-Pennington "immunizes every concerted effort that is genuinely intended to influence governmental action," as this would allow parties to violate the antitrust laws, for example by being "free to enter into horizontal price agreements. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:09 pm
The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protections are not absolute. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
That is the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:04 am
In addition, DyAnsys allegedly appeared before the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) and “falsely claim[ed] standing as the ‘manufacturer’ and seller of the P–STIM medical device. [read post]
