Search for: "Employment Law Compliance, Inc. v. Compli, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
A failure of compliance based on ignorance of the law is accordingly insufficient to establish bad faith… Absent evidence of culpable conduct that goes beyond the mere failure to comply with the verification requirements there has been no showing that Siam Thai lacked good faith. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:54 pm
Salerno v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:54 am
., First Reference Editor A recent case of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, Saskatchewan (Employment Standards) v North Park Enterprises Inc., 2019 SKCA 69 (CanLII), illustrates the importance of the Latin maxim, audi alteram partem which means “listen to the other side,” or “let the other side be heard as well. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Employee alleges constructive dismissal during COVID-19 In the matter of Martin v Stainless Process Equipment Inc., the employee filed a statement of claim on March 22, 2022 under the Simplified Rules, claiming that he had been constructively dismissed from his employment on December 13, 2021. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Employee alleges constructive dismissal during COVID-19 In the matter of Martin v Stainless Process Equipment Inc., the employee filed a statement of claim on March 22, 2022 under the Simplified Rules, claiming that he had been constructively dismissed from his employment on December 13, 2021. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm
See, e.g., Weidner v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:12 pm
Out-of-state employers should consider the expertise of local legal professionals to make sure that their California employees enjoy the benefits of this new law and that their business remains in compliance. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
About Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 3:06 am
Further, Judge's reliance on the fact that he initially prevailed at trial as proof that his interpretation of the employment agreement was reasonable is also misplaced as that order was reversed by this Court on the law (Scudder v Jack Hall Plumbing & Heating, 302 AD2d at 851). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
Commerce Energy, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
One of them involves a challenge to arbitration based on an arbitration agreement within a contingent-fee contract that does not comply with Government Code §82.065(a). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
Labor Department files suit to restore losses to the Miller’s Health Systems Employee Stock Ownership Plan Bank or other plan trustees and fiduciaries of Employee Stock Ownership Plans or other employee benefit plans holding company stock, sponsoring employers and their management should heed the new Perez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:59 am
Trendwest Resorts, Inc. (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 686, at p. 719.) [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:08 am
EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
Learn More & Get A 2012 Health Plan Compliance Checkup at 7/24 Health Plan Update WebEx Workshop! [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 8:08 am
Gadzinski v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm
Attorney and Solutions Law Press, Inc. author Cynthia Marcotte Stamer will discuss the emerging challenges and potential coping strategies for third party administrators (“TPAs”), employers and employee benefit plans for dealing with the evolving federal and state litigation, regulation, enforcement, pollical dissention, disruptions and uncertainty triggered by the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:50 am
For our case law update on the Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:41 am
That protection may be requiring the employer to notify the manager of a shutdown with sufficient time for the manager to comply with the WARN Act and securing indemnification against WARN liability if the owner gives insufficient notice to allow for WARN compliance. [read post]
