Search for: "Energizer Holdings, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:19 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the United States, sell for importation, and/or sell within the United States after importation certain inkjet ink cartridges with printheads and components thereof that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Jason Rantanen
Energizer Holdings, Inc., 405 F.3d 1367, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:57 am by Joy Waltemath
Some held the position of Transmission System Supervisors (TSSs), monitoring the transmission system in real time, “energizing” and “de-energizing” equipment to allow maintenance work, and reacting to unforeseen events that caused disruptions in the system. [read post]
Agency Enforcement FTC Requires Valeant to Divest Recently Acquired Paragon Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., parent company of Bausch+Lomb, has agreed to divest Paragon Holdings, which it acquired in May 2015, to settle charges that the acquisition violated the Clayton Act and the FTC Act. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:14 am by Stuart Kaplow
The plaintiffs in this case are the Colorado Apartment Association, Apartment Association of Metro Denver, Colorado Hotel and Lodging Association, Inc., and NAIOP Colorado Chapter. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Energizer Holdings, Inc., 405 F.3d 1367, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:21 pm by Tom Fisher
., Ltd. of Taiwan (“MicroJet”), Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. of Taiwan (“APM”), Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (“PTC”) (collectively “proposed respondents”), have engaged in violations of Section 337 through the… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Now we're asking this Senate to hold a debate and insist on a vote again, with a fundamentally new policy approach that should secure bi-partisan support. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Marriott, Jr., Chairman and CEO of Marriott International, Inc.; one of the world's leading lodging companies. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Six of which cited the case for its procedural holding.(4) See Barry Miller and Casey Stansbury, Iqbal Energizes Motion to Dismiss Practice (March 10, 2010) (discussing Iqbal’s influence in state court matters).(5) In Siemens Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
If an individual leaves an organization & joins another one, it is up to that company to decide which level they hold if any. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
  Such a conceptual space is inherently unstable, especially in the context of globalization that at once appears to shift public regulatory power to state collectives (energizing a robust sphere of public international law), even as it also appears to shift regulatory power to the private sphere. [read post]