Search for: "Enterprise Holdings, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 2,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2017, 6:50 am
In the post-privatization era of the early 21st century, some of the world’s largest publicly-listed firms are now state-owned enterprises (SOEs). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:41 am by Patricia Salkin
Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and SE Combined Services of California, Inc. obtained a building permit to construct a crematorium on a site in East Oakland. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:45 am
Microsoft Corp., 486 F.3d 541 (9th Cir.2007) (holding enterprise does not require separate structure and finding sufficient under Turkette a complaint alleging enterprise had common purpose, ongoing organization, and continuing unit); Asa-Brandt, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
Football players’ antitrust claims that the National Football League (“NFL”) and teams conspired to deprive them of their rights to football game footage are being kicked out of court after a federal judge found that the plaintiffs had failed to come within the Supreme Court’s holding in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
The First Department of the Appellate Division of New York Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the applicability of the doctrine in Ezrasons, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:49 pm
Where the Defendant E-J Enterprises, Inc., ordered and paid for aluminum railings to store for Plaintiff Brass Metal Products, Inc., until Brass Metal requested delivery, E-J owned the railings until it sold them to Brass Metal. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:05 am
  The Verderber Enterprise specializes in providing technology innovations to entrepreneurs and corporate enterprises worldwide. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm by Mark Tabakman
  In this case, the Court concluded that Enterprise Holdings Inc. was not a joint employer with its car rental subsidiaries' and therefore the plaintiff assistant managers could not seek relief against the parent company. [read post]