Search for: "Entities I-X"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
West End Equity I, Ltd. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:42 am
If I am proposing that the taxation of multinational companies' income by a given country should follow approaches A, B, and C, rather than X, Y, and Z, then I am in the normative realm, and a convincing descriptive explanation of why we in fact have corporate and international taxation would not be on point for the normative question, though perhaps illuminating it indirectly - for example, in terms of the set of feasible policies.Before I turn to the… [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
The proposal’s spotlight on foreign currency restrictions contained in Regulation S-X could be of interest to banks. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:34 pm
"...But the triple-x domain isn't quite the same as the other gTLDs. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
I have now got hold of the judgment in X v Hounslow [2008] All ER 337 (May) (thanks to assorted helpful sprites). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
As far as administrative law stuff goes, it’s a great read (even if, I must confess, I am not yet convinced of the argument). [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:46 am
When a patent owner says we know we have a lousy patent, but we know the defendant will pay us X dollars because it costs so much to litigate, that is what makes a nuisance case. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
New York has its own "mini-Stark" law addressing referrals to health care entities in which the referring practitioner has an ownership or other financial interest. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
Mayor Adams denied any wrongdoing to journalists in a video posted to X. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
" X-Men lost certain security contracts as a result. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:08 am
Die another day, because X hasn't "died" in McCutcheon, but McCutcheon is a step toward the death of X, which should distress us, if we care about X. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm
I think those more than suffice.Am I necessarily against putting certain groups of plaintiffs more closely together; e.g., letting all the plaintiffs injured in X way or deceived in Y fashion go to trial together, an putting the W and/or Z plaintiffs on a different track? [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 6:00 pm
In short, so long as the Part 2 program has obtained written consent from the patient identifying the name of the individual(s) or entity(-ies) to which a disclosure will be made, Part 2 programs may make disclosures to facilitate permissible payment and health care operations. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:47 am
Some of those are more bizarre than others, and when they are bizarre, perhaps it's because the speechwriter didn't have a concrete picture of X possessing Y in the formation Y of X. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:01 pm
But some consumers might take away the misleading implication of continuedconnection to X. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
I. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Even Apple once sold patents to a non-practicing entity (which I believe Apple wouldn't do again since it has meanwhile had to defend itself against at least one privateer). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:12 am
Subsumption & Classification If there is an x, then y m is an x Therefore: y If there is an x, then y m has all of the properties of x Therefore: y If there is an x, then y m has many of the properties of x Therefore: there is (probably) an x Therefore: there is (probably) a y If there is an x, then y m has the properties of x to some degree Therefore: there is to some degree an x Therefore: there is to… [read post]
