Search for: "Entities I-X"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 2:45 pm
So I had an interesting thought. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:53 am
X------------------------------------------------- The New York affidavit will affect prospective cases. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
., 498 F.3d at 1379 (stating “[i]ndirectinfringement requires, as a predicate, a finding that someparty amongst the accused actors has committed theentire act of direct infringement. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
I get it. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:35 pm
Second, it is usually very difficult for an American company to accurately monitor the sales of its China joint venture entity. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(o) "X-ray or imaging services" shall mean diagnostic imaging techniques which shall include but not be limited to the following: (1) conventional x-ray or radiology; (2) fluoroscopy; (3) digital radiography; (4) computed tomography; (5) magnetic resonance imaging; (6) nuclear imaging; (7) ultrasonography; and (8) angiography. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:54 am
The standard used is called X.509. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
For several reasons, I believe the answer should be no. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Films that seek to certify their films as less than X (or now NC-17) have to go through the MPAA. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:40 am
However, choice of entity is usually not just a current or future tax rate issue. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 7:28 am
I should look at this. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
I also want to thank the Woodrow Wilson Center and the X-PRIZE Foundation for their work in helping to develop this bill. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 9:25 am
Here is a sample of some of the questions I ask. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
I suppose you’re wondering if the SEC split along partisan lines once again – well, of course they did! [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:10 pm
You can check out the many other blogs I’ve written about restrictive covenants here. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 11:14 am
(B) REQUIRED INFORMATION- The information described in this subparagraph is - (i) the identity of the claimant for which the determination under subparagraph (A) was made: and (ii) such other information as the Secretary shall specify in order to enable the Secretary to make appropriate determination concerning coordination of benefits, including any applicable recovery of claim.benefits from Worker's Compensation or a liability carrier or self-insured entity, if… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
The question was whether this liaison office was liable to pay income tax on money received under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:42 am
Suppose Megabank X fails, and needs a Dodd-Frank liquidation. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
x 2 mil? [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:04 pm
E.g., X would have earned me $10 of income and generated $2 of true surplus (i.e., doing what I needed to to earn this income would have generated disutility that I value subjectively at $8.) [read post]
