Search for: "Epson Imaging Devices Corporation" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2009, 6:56 pm
A DOJ Press Release reports that "Epson Imaging Devices Corporation (Epson) agreed to plead guilty and pay a $26 million criminal fine for its role in a conspiracy to fix prices in the sale of Thin Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display... [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:20 pm
Epson Imaging Devices Corporation yesterday agreed to  confess guilt,  and pay a $26 million fine, for fixing prices on thin film transistor liquid-crystal display panels. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:56 pm
On August 25, 2009, Epson Imaging Devices Corporation (“Epson”), a Japanese electronics manufacturer, pled guilty for its role in a conspiracy to fix prices in the sale of Thin Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display (“TFT-LDC”) panels and agreed to pay a fine of $26 million. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:44 pm by Alex Gasser
., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain motion-sensitive sound effects devices and image display devices and components and products containing same that infringe one or both of U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm by The Complex Litigator
(CR 09-247 SI); Epson Imaging Devices Corporation (CR 09-854 SI); and Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation (CR 09-1166 SI). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,916,684 entitled WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK PROVIDING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MOBILE DEVICES AND ACCESS POINTS and owned by Harris Corporation. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,916,684 entitled WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK PROVIDING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MOBILE DEVICES AND ACCESS POINTS and owned by Harris Corporation. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,831,661 owned by Seiko Epson Corporation and entitled PROJECTION DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY METHOD FOR SAME AND IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]