Search for: "Epstein v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 4:19 pm
USA ex Rel ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm by Ilya Somin
However, I am far less optimistic than Epstein that the plan will be invalidated on “public use” grounds, so long as Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Here’s his statement in Politics USA. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm by William A. Ruskin
Murphy Oil, USA, 609 F.3d 1049 (5th Cir. 2010), and Native Village of Kivalina v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 The Associated Press (via USA Today) has the story. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 6:12 am
A case filed on July 10, 2009 in the New York Eastern District Court by Miguel Agui, Alexander Reyes and James Gipson v T-Mobile USA will provide the answer. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]