Search for: "Eugene I. Davis" Results 141 - 160 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
In any event, this is a pretty clearly unconstitutional policy, and I hope the university will promptly withdraw it in the face of the lawsuit. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
I blogged about this sealing controversy on Jan. 28, and I thought I'd pass along the just-filed memorandum supporting the motion to unseal. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I’m delighted to report that the new UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed its first brief, on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Edwards v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Gibson also declared that she relied on the 2016 Davis Vanguard article relating to a sexual harassment administrative claim involving him in Davis. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:02 am
"I'm not opposed to this strategy, but I do think we should examine it more closely to ensure that it will be properly and ethically used. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 12:58 pm
At Davis Law Group, we believe that all organizations that take on the responsibility of caring for and supervising children have a duty to protect those children from abusers. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 6:23 am
  Rarely is it complimentary.From Eugene Volokh comes the decision in Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
However, in many cases corporations can be viewed as the representative of or—as our UCLA colleague Eugene Volokh has suggested—a “proxy” for individual persons and groups. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:20 pm
As Eugene at My Left Wing has said, it is the policy of the Whig Party, circa 1854. and we all know how that ended for the Whigs. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 6:06 pm by Adam Steinbaugh
I do hope that Teixeira, ably represented by pro bono counsel from Davis Wright Tremaine, Dan Laidman, seeks his legal fees. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:06 am by Don Cruse
If you scroll down, you'll notice that the IT-Davy case used in this example has three opinions (majority, concurrence, dissent). [read post]