Search for: "Eugene Sullivan" Results 81 - 100 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2022, 2:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan (1999) ("Action taken by private entities with the mere approval or acquiescence of the State is not state action. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[Washington Governor Jay Inslee is supporting a law that would ban lies about election results that “are likely to incite or cause lawlessness”—an argument much like that made by supporters of the Sedition Act of 1798.] [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, and we expect to be getting two more articles from prominent free speech scholars in the next couple of months as well. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan did hold that an American government can't sue for defamation liability, even for knowing lies, and the same would likely apply to a foreign government. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Sullivan case which had introduced the requirement of actual malice, stating that it was a “threat to American Democracy”. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:54 am by Howard Wasserman
Sullivan, perhaps the Court's most important free-speech case, arose in this posture. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, the New York Times successfully challenged Alabama libel law rules, on the grounds that they allowed public officials to sue based on honest mistakes of fact (and not just knowing or reckless falsehoods)—but only as a defense to a libel lawsuit, after the suit was filed. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Fargo Police Officer Charles Sullivan testified he received more than 50 voicemail messages from Roehrich over the course of a year, the messages were insulting and harassing, and many of the messages did not request Sullivan call him back or mention the traffic ticket Sullivan issued to Roehrich's son. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan (1963), where a state commission threatened to prosecute stores that sold books that it viewed as pornography (including books that were actually protected by the First Amendment). [read post]