Search for: "Eugene Sullivan" Results 141 - 160 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 292 (1964); see Karaduman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Sullivan,the court essentially guaranteed that corporations will be sidelined for at least the next election cycle. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
[You might also read my earlier post on the subject, Anti-Libel Injunctions and the Criminal Libel Connection and The First Amendment and Criminal Libel Law; or you can read the whole article in PDF.] [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Sullivan [Will Baude, Cass Sunstein, Ramesh Ponnuru] “A new documentary showcased by PBS presents Montana as a success story of campaign finance reform and Wisconsin’s John Doe investigations as a failure. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 22 January 2019 Mr Justice Mann heard a Pre-Trial Review in the latest News Group Newspapers phone hacking case, due for trial 4 February 2019. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
It could be an uphill climb, according to Eugene Volokh (a First Amendment expert, and hardly anyone's idea of a leftist). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 300 (1964) ("If individual citizens may be held liable in damages for strong words, which a jury finds false and maliciously motivated, there can be little doubt that public debate and advocacy will be constrained. [read post]