Search for: "Eugene Sullivan"
Results 161 - 180
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 5:02 am
Sullivan: I. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 300 (1964) ("If individual citizens may be held liable in damages for strong words, which a jury finds false and maliciously motivated, there can be little doubt that public debate and advocacy will be constrained. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 300 (1964) ("If individual citizens may be held liable in damages for strong words, which a jury finds false and maliciously motivated, there can be little doubt that public debate and advocacy will be constrained. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and its progeny. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Sullivan (1964). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
It is far different than that in Sullivan which altered law that existed for 175 years and has spawned a cottage industry over the last 60. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
Fargo Police Officer Charles Sullivan testified he received more than 50 voicemail messages from Roehrich over the course of a year, the messages were insulting and harassing, and many of the messages did not request Sullivan call him back or mention the traffic ticket Sullivan issued to Roehrich's son. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
For these reasons, we conclude that the temporary restraining order, as well as the permanent injunction restraining Sullivan's speech, constitute unconstitutional prior restraints in derogation of Sullivan's right to speak. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
Sullivan (1964) famously held that government officials can prevail in defamation lawsuits only if they can show that the defendant knew the statement was false, or was reckless about the possibility of falsehood — but it also, less famously, held that government entities can’t sue for defamation, period, regardless of the defendant’s mental state: For good reason, “no court of last resort in this country has ever held, or even suggested, that prosecutions for… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm
Sullivan—failed to carry the day: Six out of the nine Justices rejected such categorical immunity for statements in public debate (even for speech about public officials, and not just about people who are famous but who don't exercise government power). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
Sullivan, eds., 2002). [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 7:36 pm
Sullivan, and the court concluded that it applies to tribal governments as well. [2.] [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:50 pm
University president Teresa Sullivan promised a full investigation and also to examine the way the school responds to sexual assault allegations. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Sullivan, and the court concluded that it applies to tribal governments as well. [2.] [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 6:55 am
Sullivan (1963). [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:32 am
Sullivan (1964), R.A.V. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 2:01 pm
Sullivan (1991), on which Pleasant Grove relied, When Congress established a National Endowment for Democracy to encourage other countries to adopt democratic principles, it was not constitutionally required to fund a program to encourage competing lines of political philosophy such as communism and fascism. [read post]
