Search for: "Ex Parte Henderson" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm by Steve Vladeck
And so, whereas Judge Henderson makes great hay in her dissent out of the fact that "the Supreme Court has found a violation of the Judicial Power Clause in only two cases—both involving bankruptcy courts," she completely neglects the myriad other cases (including Ex parte Milligan, Toth, Reid v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
The Supreme Court said in 1942’s Ex Parte Quirin (the Nazi saboteurs case) that a military commission could try defendants for violations of the law of war, which the Court depicted as predominantly, if not exclusively, international in nature. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Though the state supreme court held that, as a matter of state law, the trial court erred in conducting the hearing ex parte, it determined that the errors were harmless. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
And yet, the government devoted only 11 pages of its 70-page brief to the Article III issue, largely cribbing from Judge Kavanaugh’s discussion of the Article III challenge in his solo opinion concurring in part in and dissenting in part from the en banc majority. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm by Wells Bennett
The Majority Opinion Judge Henderson penned the opinion for the court. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:08 am by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson wrote the main opinion establishing much, but not all, of the law decided Monday. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:29 am by Wells Bennett
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
As I wrote in 2013 legislative testimony in my role as Policy Director for the Innocence Project of Texas: The issue [also] came up in Ex Parte Henderson (2012), [in which] five judges agreed to grant Cathy Lynn Henderson a new trial in a per curiam opinion, but no single interpretation of the law could gain more than four votes on the court, meaning at present there is no clear, agreed upon theory regarding how and why relief may be granted. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Wells Bennett
 Today, a three-judge panel affirmed the district court’s rejection of the ex-detainee’s suit against government officials: KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: As part of its global war on terrorism, the United States detained Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak al Janko in Afghanistan and at United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay (Guantanamo) in Cuba for seven years before the district court granted him a writ of habeas corpus and ordered that diplomatic… [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
He points to the Geneva Conventions, the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Ex Parte Quirin, and Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:53 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
For example, nearly all analyses of habeas center around the federal writ (Guantanamo Bay, etc.), but most prisoners (around 93%) are incarcerated in state systems and the examination of state-level habeas processes like those in Ex Parte Robbins are mostly ignored in policy debates. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The case is notable both for a) the quick turnaround and b) the lack of dissent among a court that was divided 5-4 on similar questions in Ex Parte Robbins, Overton and Henderson. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
If she does return to Primark in Leytonstone the travelling involved, though difficult and time-consuming, is not impossible, specially for a part-time job. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
If she does return to Primark in Leytonstone the travelling involved, though difficult and time-consuming, is not impossible, specially for a part-time job. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Jorgenson affirmed sanctions against a lawyer for failing to cite adverse precedent in the context of an ex parte proceeding. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
The defamation case of Jooste v GMC was heard on 26 June 2012 and an ex tempore judgment given. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:19 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court held that “the EEOC can contact former managers ex parte for the purposes of this administrative investigation, prior to the potential commencement of a lawsuit” and granted the EEOC’s motion to enforce the subpoena. [read post]