Search for: "Ex parte Owens" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
FEC Chairwoman: Penalty ‘slashed’ for ex-congressman who used leftover campaign money to lobby Roll Call – Emily Kopp | Published: 8/19/2019 Former U.S. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
Citibank, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, which also sits in Houston and lords over the same trial courts in ten surrounding counties, did not merely hold that use of credit card and payments to account demonstrated existence of contract (thus ruling against the Defendant on that issue), but also reversed the judgment in part because the bank had not adduced any evidence of what the variable interest rate was at the relevant time (thereby sustaining one of the Defendant’s complaints… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:45 am by Jon Sands
  However, the 9th vacated the sentence in part because of an ex post facto error. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Initially The judge gave an ex tempore judgment allowing Mrs Smith’s appeal on the basis that the District Judge had erred in assessing the daily rate of damages for trespass. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
I therefore thought I'd blog the text of the draft brief here, and invite all of you to tell me why I'm wrong altogether, why I'm wrong on specific details, how the proposal could be improved, or even what parts of the proposal seem likely to be confusing to the judges. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
” On the same day, the Court said in another decision, Ex Parte Endo, that the government couldn’t detain an “admittedly loyal citizen” indefinitely. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Shreve Ariail
As many Lawfare readers are aware, Congress enacted Section 702 in July 2008 as part of the FISA Amendments Act. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
For the reasons set forth below, Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part, as set forth below.BACKGROUNDBecause of the wide array of conduct alleged in Plaintiffs' Consolidated Complaint, (R. 79), and the varying circumstances alleged as to each named Plaintiff, the Court sets forth only a general background of the allegations sufficient to enable an understanding of the more specific allegations that are discussed in each section of the Court's… [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
But it is one built in part at least, on a misrepresentation of how care proceedings operate (and what McFarlane J actually said). [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Financialization”Governance and Private Interests in American Law and Business, 1960-1990     Chair & Discussant: Edward Balleisen, Duke University    Gerardo Con Diaz, University of California, Davis    “IBM Software and American Patent Law in the 1960s”    Anne Fleming, Georgetown University Law Center    “Small-Dollar Loans and the New Financial Federalism”    Erik… [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
” On the same day, the Court said in another decision, Ex Parte Endo, that the government couldn’t detain an “admittedly loyal citizen” indefinitely. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm by Micah Belden
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Nationalist MP Jason Azzopardi said he will be filing libel proceedings against Justice Minister Owen Bonnici. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Oregon Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If so, the court has chosen a case of first impression which addresses only changes in overall scientific understanding, not recantations of bad science testimony proffered by individual scientists, which was the issue raised in the cowardly Ex Parte Robbins decision recently where the court punted instead of interpreting the new law. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:47 am by Jim Sedor
Dennis Hastert, Ex-Speaker of House, Pleads GuiltyNew York Times – Monica Davey and Mitch Smith | Published: 10/28/2015 Former U.S. [read post]