Search for: "Excess Insurance Co" Results 1 - 20 of 2,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 6:22 am by Janine Stanisz
Bonding & Insurance Co. in 1928, it has been well-settled that a policyholder can compromise a disputed claim with its insurer for less than the full limits of the policy without putting its rights to excess coverage at risk. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:14 am by sally
In re Employers’ Liability “Trigger” Litigation; Durham v BAI (Run-off) Ltd; Freming & Eddlestone v Independent Insurance Co Ltd; Edwards v Excess Insurance Co Ltd; Thomas Bates & Son Ltd v BAI (Run-off) Ltd; Akzo; Nobel UK Ltd and another v Excess Insurance Co Ltd; Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Co and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1096; [2010] WLR (D) 256… [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
Self-insured employers purchase excess insurance coverage to limit the risk of exposure to catastrophic injuries. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:00 pm by Alex Hartzler
Co., 2012 IL App (5th) 110583, the court held that an insured may not target tender defense to an excess insurer until its primary coverage has been exhausted. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
The operator's insurance company declined to join in defending the suit, arguing that its policy was an excess policy and not co-primary insurance. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Co.(2nd Dept., decided 8/19/2015)At what point is excess to unlimited coverage triggered? [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:51 am by Chad W. Dunham
Arch Insurance Co., a case stemming from a class action settlement, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified several areas of California law involving the interaction of primary and excess insurance coverage, as well as what constitutes adequate notice to excess carriers. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co., 23 F.2d 225 (2d Cir. 1928), arguing that where an excess insurance policy ambiguously defines “exhaustion,” settlement with an underlying insurer constitutes exhaustion of the underlying policy, for purposes of determining when the excess coverage attaches. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:24 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  On May 14, 2010, BP PLC provided notice of claim to the insurers, which include Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London; Axis Specialty Europe Ltd.; Arch Insurance Co., Ltd.; Berkeley Insurance Co.; Houston Casualty Insurance Co.; National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.; Navigators Insurance Co.; Infrassure Ltd.; Great American Insurance Co. of New York;… [read post]