Search for: "Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The transaction was fraught with risks about misappropriation of Google technology and the deal terms reflected this concern: there were "atypical" indemnity provisions and Uber paid only $100,000 for what consisted of the combined human capital of Levandowski and his team rather than a full-fledged company. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:31 am by brittania
  The insurers named in the settlement are Executive Risk Indemnity Inc., Federal Insurance Co., Great Northern Insurance Co., Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co., Pacific Indemnity Co., and Vigilant Insurance Co. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
”       Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in Executive Risk Indemnity v, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, we see Justice Jone's decision on this issue: "We are asked to determine, under Pennsylvania law, whether excess insurers Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, based upon their prior knowledge exclusions, and Continental Casualty Company, based upon rescission of its policies, were entitled to summary judgment declaring that they have no… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
Here, in Executive Risk Indemnity v, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, we see Justice Jone's decision on this issue: "We are asked to determine, under Pennsylvania law, whether excess insurers Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. and Twin City Fire Insurance Company, based upon their prior knowledge exclusions, and Continental Casualty Company, based upon rescission of its policies, were entitled to summary judgment declaring that they have… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
The statutes in Delaware, New York, California, and also in Minnesota, provide that the protection of indemnity extends as to persons no longer in the corporate role related to the lawsuit. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In short, the Court is telling all of us that until the subcontract is executed and the terms made plain, perform at your own risk. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:07 am by Charles Sartain
The district court ruled that BP could not access Transocean’s policies because Transocean was only required to name BP as an additional insured as to the risks Transocean assumed in the indemnities provisions of the drilling contract which did not include oil pollution risks. [read post]