Search for: "Exelis, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 5,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 8:15 am
In State ex rel. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:08 pm
He had been ordered to enter into a contract with Florida Lawyers Assistance, Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:43 pm
DirecTV Enters., Inc.), as “at least one of A and at least one of B. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
Medtronic Inc., et. al. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:38 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission will be taking a closer look at the actions of ex- Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:49 am
” Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
” Kemco Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 am
Inc., 309 F.3d 774 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:43 pm
Cir. 1994) (citing Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416 (2007). [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 10:18 am
PTAB cites to KSR and Keller in Ex parte Gontkosky:Appellants’ arguments are not persuasive. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 1:27 pm
from Ex parte DAMSOHN It is fundamental patent law that “each and every claim limitationmust be explicitly or inherently disclosed in the prior art” for an anticipationrejection to be proper.In re NTP, Inc., 654 F.3d 1279, 1302(Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
MEDIA ADVISORY: PRESS CONFERENCE OF EX WORKERS OF DOBAKE BAKERIES Who: Committee of former workers from Dobake Bakeries, Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
"Ex-Goldman director Gupta seeks reversal in insider trading case": Nate Raymond of Reuters has a report that begins, "A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday signaled it was unlikely to overturn the 2012 insider trading conviction of Rajat Gupta, a former director of Goldman Sachs Group Inc and global managing director of McKinsey & Co. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
RGB Systems Inc., CV 09-8402 (CDCA). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:46 am
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416 (2007). [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:18 am
” King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
In IPR2012-00035, on January 22, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board ("PTAB") (A.P.J.s Lane, Robertson and Guest) issued an order concerning an ex parte email sent by Petitioner Nissan North America, Inc. [read post]
