Search for: "F Solis" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 1:56 pm by Jon Sands
Roblero-Solis, 588 F.3d 692 (9th Cir. 2009), the 9th, in a case from the same district, division and same AFPD, held that Fed R. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:26 am by Allen B. Roberts
 There are indications that Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis and other newly appointed officials and members of the DOL’s Administrative Review Board will be examining positions and precedents in prior interpretations of SOX protections that had been criticized by advocates as not sufficiently inclusive of intended whistleblower rights. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:26 pm by Allen B. Roberts
 There are indications that Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis and other newly appointed officials and members of the DOL’s Administrative Review Board will be examining positions and precedents in prior interpretations of SOX protections that had been criticized by advocates as not sufficiently inclusive of intended whistleblower rights. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
LaSalle Bank National Ass’n, 552 F.3d 613, 619 (7th Cir. 2009) (Lexecon waiver possible but ineffective); In re Carbon Dioxide Industry Antitrust Litigation, 229 F.3d 1321, 1326-27 (11th Cir. 2000) (Lexeconwaiver held valid); Solis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 8:18 pm
United States, 441 F.3d 220, 227-28 (4th Cir.2006) (discussing holdings of the various Circuit Courts of Appeal); Solis-Alarcon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:47 am
Moreover, "the examiner must provide specific factual findings predicated on sound technical and scientific reasoning to support his or her conclusion of common knowledge" (MPEP 2144.03(B); see In re Soli, 317 F.2d 941, 946, (CCPA  1963); see also In re Chevenard, 139 F.2d 711, 713 (CCPA  1943)).The Applicant concluded the Appeal Brief with: Appellants submit that the above well-known statement lacks any factual evidence to support the prima facie case… [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 5:13 am
Section 2(e)(1) - Deceptive Misdescriptiveness: TTAB Affirms Trifusal of NRG for Coffee: 2(d), 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness and Deceptive MisdescriptivenessSection 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive: TTAB Sustains Opposition to SCOTTSDALE TAXI: Geographically Descriptive and Lacks Acquired DistinctivenessTTAB Affirms Geographical Descriptiveness Refusal of LEIPER'S FORK DISTILLERY for ClothingSection 2(e)(3) - Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive: TTAB… [read post]