Search for: "FEDERALLY EMPLOYED DOCTORS" Results 41 - 60 of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 12:08 pm by Michael Lowe
The Unit employs investigators, auditors and attorneys who conduct investigations and assist in the prosecution of Medicaid providers who defraud the system or abuse the elderly. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The court stated that the report was required because Morrison intended to ask the doctor for expert testimony about three operations performed by other doctors, in addition to testifying about the medical treatment that he did provide. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
    The Defendants argued that the two (2) one (1) page reports issued by this doctor did not satisfy the extensive report requirements relative to expert witness reports under the Federal Rules. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Joe Sanders
The medical board is aware of the prison pipeline -- in fact, a board-employed headhunter has sometimes helped problem doctors get prison gigs. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
An accountant formerly employed at WPP agency I-Behavior, which tracks consumer purchase data, says her job was so stressful she was hospitalized twice, and that she was forced out of her job after her doctor told her the pressure at work could cause heart damage. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
An accountant formerly employed at WPP agency I-Behavior, which tracks consumer purchase data, says her job was so stressful she was hospitalized twice, and that she was forced out of her job after her doctor told her the pressure at work could cause heart damage. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:57 pm by Staff Writer
  FBI Runs Child Porn Site   What is surprising is the new FBI investigation technique used in the doctor’s case which is increasingly being employed by the FBI in child pornography cases, i.e., a federal law enforcement agency running a child pornography site. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
SB8’s peculiar design was intended to circumvent the venerable principle—going back at least as far as the 1908 Supreme Court decision in Ex Parte Young—allowing people threatened with harm by an unconstitutional state law to sue state officials in federal court for an injunction against the law’s enforcement.By taking enforcement out of the hands of state officials, SB8 aimed to deprive potential plaintiffs (such as doctors who perform abortions) of anybody… [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
Last week, a federal court refused to dismiss FMLA claims made against the employer by an employee who was terminated for exceeding the number of "episodes" of depression his doctor estimated he would have. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:59 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
According to the indictment, Doctor A was licensed to practice medicine in Illinois until July 31, 2008, and Doctor A was employed by Charm from May 2005 until February 2009. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:59 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
According to the indictment, Doctor A was licensed to practice medicine in Illinois until July 31, 2008, and Doctor A was employed by Charm from May 2005 until February 2009. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:53 am
Results from a 2009 report funded by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality showed that 28% of diagnostic mistakes were life-threatening or had resulted in death or permanent disability. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm by Joey Fishkin
  Everyone else in the U.S. earning $50k/year can have this—whether they’re employed, under-employed, self-employed, etc. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 6:46 am by Arfaa Law Group
Factual and Procedural Background of the Case It is alleged that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in federal court against the defendant, arguing that the doctors it employed failed to provide him with proper medical care or prescribe him with antibiotics, despite the fact that he was suffering from an infection. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:40 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Thus, he filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging the doctor’s failure to warn the plaintiff of the potential risks associated with the medication and the failure to provide prompt treatment for his resulting harm constituted medical malpractice. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 5:34 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
Your attorney may recommend otherwise, as any railroad-employed doctors will likely have a certain conflict of interest. [read post]